Influence of a hyaluronan-binding system for sperm selection in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles on embryo morphokinetic parameters and in vitro fertilization cycle outcomes.

PURPOSE: Although the impact of the paternal contribution to embryo quality and blastocyst formation is a well-known phenomenon, the current literature provides insufficient evidence that hyaluronan-binding sperm selection methods improve assisted reproductive treatment outcomes. Thus, we compared the cycle outcomes of morphologically selected intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with hyaluronan binding physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection (PICSI) cycles. METHODS: A total of 2415 ICSI and 400 PICSI procedures of 1630 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization cycles using a time-lapse monitoring system between 2014 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Fertilization rate, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were evaluated, differences in morphokinetic parameters and cycle outcomes were compared. RESULTS: In total, 85.8 and 14.2% of the whole cohort were fertilized with standard ICSI and PICSI, respectively. The proportion of fertilized oocytes did not significantly differ between groups (74.53 ± 1.33 vs. 72.92 ± 2.64, p > 0.05). Similarly, the proportion of good-quality embryos according to the time-lapse parameters and the clinical pregnancy rate did not significantly differ between groups (71.93 ± 4.21 vs. 71.33 ± 2.64, p > 0.05 and 45.55 ± 2.91 vs. 44.96 ± 1.25, p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in clinical pregnancy rates (45.55 ± 2.91 vs. 44.96 ± 1.25, p > 0.05). Biochemical pregnancy rates (11.24 ± 2.12 vs. 10.85 ± 1.83, p > 0.05) and miscarriage rates (24.89 ± 3.74 vs. 27.91 ± 4.91, p > 0.05) were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The effects of the PICSI procedure on fertilization rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, embryo quality, and clinical pregnancy outcomes were not superior. The effect of the PICSI procedure on embryo morphokinetics was not apparent when all parameters were considered.

The Effects of Microfluidic Sperm Sorting, Density Gradient and Swim-up Methods on Semen Oxidation Reduction Potential.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of microfluidic sperm sorting, density gradient and swim-up methods on the oxidative reduction potential (ORP) of split semen samples from a single patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective controlled study was conducted to compare the effects of three different semen processing methods using split semen samples from the same population of infertile men. The primary outcome was the ORP. Secondary outcomes were the sperm concentration, progressive motility rate and total sperm motility. RESULTS: A total of 57 split semen samples were included in this study. The ORP was significantly lower in the microfluidic group compared to the density gradient and swim-up groups (p < 0.05). The ORP/sperm concentration ratio was significantly lower in the microfluidic and density gradient groups compared to the swim-up group (p < 0.05).Total sperm concentration was significantly higher in the density gradient group than the microfluidic and swim-up groups (p < 0.05). Motility was significantly higher in the microfluidic and swim-up groups than the density gradient group (p < 0.05). The progressive motile sperm rate was significantly higher in the microfluidic and swim-up groups than the density gradient group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Microfluidic sperm sorting was better for selecting highly motile sperm and yielded a lower ORP than conventional sperm preparation methods.

Comparison of microfluid sperm sorting chip and density gradient methods for use in intrauterine insemination cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of microfluiding sperm sorting chip and density gradient methods on ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs) of patients undergoing IUI. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hospital IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Couples with infertility undergoing IUI cycles between 2017 and 2018. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing PRs. RESULT(S): A total of 265 patients were included in the study. Microfluid sperm sorting and density gradient were used to prepare sperm in 133 and 132 patients, respectively. Baseline spermiogram parameters, including volume, concentration, motility, and morphology, were similar between the two groups. Total motile sperm count was lower in the microfluiding sperm sorting group at baseline (35.96 ± 37.69 vs. 70.66 ± 61.65). After sperm preparation sperm motility was higher in the microfluid group (96.34 ± 7.29 vs. 84.42 ± 10.87). Pregnancy rates were 18.04% in the microfluid group and 15.15% in the density gradient group, and ongoing PRs were 15.03% and 9.09%, respectively. After using multivariable logistic regression and controling for confounding factors, there was a significant increase in ongoing PRs in the microfluid sperm sorting group. The adjusted odds ratio for ongoing pregnancy in the microfluid group compared with the density gradient group was 3.49 (95% confidence interval 1.12-10.89). CONCLUSION(S): The microfluid sperm sorting method significantly increased the ongoing PRs compared with the density gradient group in IUI cycles.